
Inside this Edition: Governor Pataki Calls For
Fiscal Restraint, President’s Message, Court
Holds That Promissory Estoppel Applies To Bids, Bill Which
Grants Unions Prevailing Wage Enforcement Powers Delivered To Governor, Welcome New Members, Business Council
Fights “Labor Neutrality Law, Grace Period Ends For
Annualization Of Supplements, Nesca Members Reminded To
Complete Economic Census, Bruno Appoints New Judiciary
Committee Chairman, Airport Authority Joins Online
Purchasing Group, Comptroller Says Contractor Can’t
Wear 2 Hats, New Yorkers Prefer Cutting Government To
Raising Taxes
Facing a huge potential budget deficit, Governor Pataki called for fiscal restraint in his January 8, 2003 State of the State message. In his 9th annual address to the state Legislature, the Governor said he will propose a state budget that would reduce spending in every area but public security, preserve already enacted tax cuts, and enact new tax incentives to encourage high-tech job creation.
Citing
the tremendous damage caused to New York’s finances by the terrorist attacks
and the national economic downturn, the Governor called for fiscal discipline,
perseverance and nonpartisanship in addressing the State’s unprecedented fiscal
challenges. He stated that the combined
impact of 9/11 and the prolonged economic downturn has severely affected tax
revenues and contributed to a potential deficit of approximately $2 billion in
the current fiscal year, and a shortfall several times larger in the upcoming
fiscal year. The Governor indicated
that he will submit a Budget that: reduces year-to-year spending; reforms
Medicaid and other government programs; proposes the privatization of certain
State assets; and reduces debt costs by taking advantage of lower interest
rates. The Governor did not
specifically indicate how capital construction programs and state building aid
to school districts would be impacted in his budget.
The leadership in the Republican-led Senate and Democratic-led Assembly reacted predictably to the Governor’s speech. Senate Majority Leader Joseph Bruno stated “I applaud the Governor for his commitment to continuing tax cuts that have made New York more competitive and his commitment to building on those tax cuts to create more jobs.” Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver, on the other hand, said “One thing I can assure you, the Assembly Majority will not allow impending budget cuts to be balanced solely on the backs of our children, our working families, or our public servants”.
In
a letter to the Governor, The Business Council of New York State hailed the
Governor’s message of ongoing tax cuts and reduced spending. In November, the Public Policy Institute (the
research arm of the Business Council) began publishing a regular series of
one-page fact sheets on different aspects of the state’s fiscal situation, from
debt to local aid. PPI’s research has
uncovered some important and interesting facts about the state’s fiscal health:
Ø In the past five years,
state-funds expenditures have risen by 32 percent, more than twice the rate of
inflation. If state-funds spending had
simply kept pace with inflation since 1998, this year’s total would be $7.9
billion lower.
Ø Medicaid spending will total
$36 billion in New York this fiscal year.
If New York could simply bring its per-capita Medicaid spending down to
twice the national average, taxpayers would save more than $4 billion a year.
Ø In the last five years, New
York has added $3.7 billion to state aid for schools. That’s a 34 percent increase, more than twice the inflation rate.
Ø Taxes in New York are the
second-highest in the country, on a per-capita basis, behind Connecticut. Adjusted for income, our combined state and
local tax burden is No. 1 among all the states.
Ø As of the end of November,
the state had lost 42,400 private-sector jobs over the year. In contrast, however, state government
employment had risen over the year by 1,600 jobs.
Ø Property taxes per capita in
New York were about 50 percent above the national average in 2000, about $2,378
for every resident.
Ø State and local elected
officials have given taxpayers in New York a debt burden of $9,357 per capita,
second in the nation behind Alaska, and 81 percent above the national average.
NESCA WILL NOT HAVE A FEBRUARY MEMBERSHIP MEETING.
MEMBERS ARE ENCOURAGED TO REGISTER FOR THE FEB. 15TH
VALENTINE DINNER DANCE.

PRESIDENT’S MESSAGE
(Go
Top)
On
January 16th, NESCA’s Board of Directors held its annual strategic
planning meeting at the Century House.
In preparation for this meeting, Board members were asked to complete a
short survey. One of the questions
asked them to list the major business problems/challenges they face entering
2003. Not so surprisingly, the three
most common responses we received were (1) getting paid; (2) the availability
and affordability of liability insurance and; (3) employee productivity/work
ethic. With the beginning of a new year,
NESCA, primarily through our state affiliate Empire State Subcontractors
Association (ESSA), will be focusing on these issues as well as other issues of
importance to subcontractors and suppliers.
We will continue to support reform of sections 240/241 of the Labor Law
in an effort to increase the availability and lower the cost of general
liability insurance. We have introduced
a number of bills designed to reduce and protect retainage held by owners on
private and public construction projects.
We will continue meeting with the NYS Dormitory Authority in an effort
to improve that agency’s payment record, particularly concerning change orders
and final payment. And our March 13th
membership meeting program will focus on employee issues in the form of “Human
Resources Jeopardy”.
In
short, NESCA will be working hard during the coming year to assistance members
with the challenges they face in many ways; from legislative and administrative
action to information and education.
The legislative session is shaping up to be a contentious one with New
York facing a $2 billion budget deficit (see page 1 article on the Governor’s
State of the State message). That’s why
we need more subcontractors and suppliers than ever to get on Board with NESCA
and work with us to protect our common interests. We all know of subcontractors and suppliers who are NOT members
of NESCA. Let’s all increase our
efforts this year to bring them into the fold.
In other words, lets ALL make a commitment to recruit a new member. New members benefit through exposure to the
tremendous amount of information disseminated by NESCA, and the association
benefits through political clout gained through increased numbers. In this case, size DOES matter!
Those
of you who attended NESCA’s January 9th joint membership meeting
with NAWIC were treated to a fantastic presentation by David Biggs about the
World Trade Center Disaster. Mr. Biggs,
with Ryan-Biggs Associates, was one of 18 engineers asked to serve on the
Building Assessment Team formed to determine specifically why the towers came
down. His presentation was extremely
interesting and very informative! A
sincere “thank you” goes out to Adam Ross Cut Stone Co., Inc. for sponsoring
the January 9th membership meeting.
NESCA
won’t be holding a regular membership meeting in February, but we will hold a
Valentine Dinner Dance on February 15th at the Century House. The Dinner Dance is a fabulous event and I
encourage all members to join us for an extremely enjoyable night of
socializing, dancing and great food!
James M. Elacqua, President
COURT
HOLDS THAT PROMISSORY ESTOPPEL APPLIES TO BIDS
(Go Top)
The Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, Third Department on
December 26, 2002 decided Bunkoff General Contractors, Inc. v. Duham
Electric, Inc. Plaintiff in
this case was the successful bidder as general contractor for a local
renovation project. In preparing its
bid, plaintiff incorporated a quotation for electrical work submitted by
defendant. According to plaintiff,
before submitting its bid to the owner, its representatives contacted
defendant’s president to confirm the quotation and informed him that if they
were awarded the project, the electrical work would be awarded to defendant. Prior to awarding the bid to anyone,
however, the owner informed the plaintiff, and apparently all other bidders to
come up with cost reduction suggestions.
Defendant thereafter made two written proposals containing various cost
reductions which were passed on to the owner.
After plaintiff was formally awarded the contract, but before any
written subcontract was executed between them, defendant refused to perform the
electrical work on the project. The
plaintiff secured another electrical subcontractor for a higher price and then
commenced this action sounding in promissory estoppel to recover the difference
between the defendant’s bid and the amount paid to the substitute
subcontractor. The court pointed out
the concept of promissory estoppel provides a remedy for persons who
detrimentally rely on the promises of others and are injured thereby. The court further stated that in its view,
the weight of controlling, recent authority compelled the conclusion that the
doctrine (of promissory estoppel) can be asserted as a viable cause of action
in New York State. The court further
rejected the defendant’s argument that the doctrine of promissory estoppel is
not a legally cognizable cause of action in disputes regarding construction
contract bids.
This case illustrates the
application of the doctrine of promissory estoppel to construction bids. More specifically, where a subcontractor who
makes a clear and unambiguous promise to a contractor when it submits its quote
and where the contractor reasonably relies upon the subcontractor’s promise in
submitting its own bid to the project owner, the subcontractor will be
prevented from subsequently refusing to honor its bid prior to entering into
the subcontract. The fact that the
subcontractor has not yet entered into the subccontact with the contractor will
not relieve its liability to the contractor who has relied upon the
subcontractor’s bid.
Terence J. Burke, Esq., NESCA Legal Counsel
BILL
WHICH GRANTS UNIONS PREVAILING WAGE ENFORCEMENT POWERS DELIVERED TO
GOVERNOR (Go Top)
A
bill which would grant unions the same standing to enforce the prevailing wage
law as the public owner in charge of a public work project has been sent to
Governor Pataki for his consideration.
This bill, S.7562/ A.11582, was passed by both houses of the state
Legislature in June but was not delivered to the Governor until December 30th.
The
bill, which would amend Section 223 of the Labor Law, states that “….an
employee organization shall have the same standing to enforce the provisions of
this article against a contractor or any subcontractor as the officer,
department, board or commission in charge of such public work contract if any
of the employee organization’s members were employed on such public work
project by any contractor or subcontractor who fails to comply with or evades
the provisions of this article. It
shall not be necessary for the fiscal officer to present evidence of such
non-compliance or evasion to the employee organization in order for said
employee organization to enforce the provisions of this article…..”
NESCA
has strongly opposed this bill for a variety of reasons and has questioned its
constitutionality. It is NESCA’s
position that there are many remedies currently available to adequately enforce
the prevailing wage law. Public
contracting agencies and the Department of Labor have the right to withhold
payments from contractors, assess penalties and interest where a contractor or
subcontractor has underpaid wages, and debar contractors and subcontractors for
willful violations of the law. While
the association has long supported the vigorous and fair enforcement of
prevailing wage requirements, this legislation goes completely over the edge,
anointing private labor unions with governmental prosecutorial and enforcement
powers, something NESCA believes is clearly unconstitutional. To make matters worse, the bill would allow
unions to enforce the prevailing wage law completely absent any evidence that a
contractor or subcontractor has even violated the law.
NESCA
has urged Governor Pataki to veto this bill, arguing that the bill will arm
unions with astonishing new powers but will not result in improved enforcement
of the prevailing wage law. Since the bill
was delivered to the Governor at the very end of the year, it automatically
became a “30-day bill”, meaning the Governor has 30 days to sign or veto this
measure.
WELCOME NEW MEMBERS
(Go Top)
Capital Region
Insur. Agency, Inc.
1021 Watervliet Shaker Road
Albany, NY 12205
(518) 456-8965; Fax (518)
456-3901
Contacts: Peter Hanely, Bob
Franzese
Long Island
Pipe
60 Cohoes Ave.
Green Island, NY 12183
(866) 800-9359; Fax (518)
270-8384
Contact: Paul Badejo
Riverside
Fab., Inc.
1 Pruyn’s Island Drive
Glens Falls, NY 12801
(518) 798-3533; Fax (518)
798-1711
Contact: Erla S. Oakley
Star Roofing
and Restoration
P.O. Box 941
Albany, NY 12201
(518) 449-3422; Fax (518)
449-3426
Contacts: Peter Wall, James Wall
Utica Mutual
Insurance Company
P.O. Box 530
Utica, NY 13503
(315) 734-2943; Fax (315)
734-2149
Contacts: Hal Winstell, Rick Pesano
Victaulic Co.
of America
19 Pine Meadows
Exeter, NH 03833
(508) 878-7367; Fax (603)
773-0052
Contacts::S. MacDonald,,Ben Lauletta
Woodstone
Development, LLC
P.O. Box 338
Bethel, NY 12720
(845) 583-6500; Fax (845)
583-8011
Contact: David Allen
ESSA Board of Directors Meeting NESCA Board of Directors Meeting
Fort Orange Club, Albany, 5 pm Century House, Latham, 6
pm
February 15,
2003 March
6, 2003
Valentine Dinner Dance NESCA Board of Directors Meeting
Century House, Latham, 6 pm Century House,
Latham, 6 pm
![]()
The NESCA Valentine Dinner
Dance is Returning After an 8-Year Absence!
Saturday, February 15, 2003
Century House, Latham
Information and Registration
Forms at the NESCA Office!
Order Your Tickets Today!!
Get Your Ticket
for NESCA’s 18th Annual Frank Campito Memorial Car/Cash Giveaway
Nearly $35,000 in Prizes to be Awarded!!
Tickets Available at the NESCA Office – Call (518)
869-9800
$200.00 Per Ticket
Bennington
Iron Works was the member pulled in the monthly $100 attendance incentive
drawing at the January 9th membership meeting. Sorry you weren’t there!
Better
luck next time!
BUSINESS COUNCIL FIGHTS “LABOR NEUTRALITY LAW” (Go Top)
The
Business Council of New York State has asked the National Labor Relations Board
(NLRB) to issue an injunction preventing New York State from implementing its
controversial “labor neutrality law.”
“The
NLRB should issue an injunction declaring the law invalid because the law is
preempted by the National Labor Relations Act”, Business Council President
Daniel B. Walsh said in a December 31 letter to Arthur F. Rosenfeld, general counsel
of the NLRB. The NLRB oversees federal
labor law and has the authority to enjoin enforcement of state laws on the
ground that the field of labor relations is preempted by the National Labor
Relations Act. The Walsh letter also
applauded the NLRB for beginning an inquiry into the law through an October 30
letter from Margery E. Lieber, an NLRB attorney, to state Labor Commissioner
Linda Angello.
On
September 30, 2002, Governor Pataki signed the so-called “labor neutrality
law”, a measure that will leverage state purchasing and contracting to help
unions organize. The law is designed to
keep taxpayer funds from being used to counter union organizing efforts. Specifically, the law prohibits the use of
state funds and facilities to assist, promote or deter union organizing, and
requires employers to keep records of the expenditures of state funds
sufficient to show that state funds have not been utilized in this manner. The business community had vehemently opposed
this bill arguing that it undermined the NLRA, limited employers’ first
amendment rights to free speech, and posed a cumbersome and expensive
accounting burden for businesses.
The
Walsh letter noted that organized labor has asked state legislatures for such
laws in California, New Jersey and New York in an effort to “seek advantages
Congress specifically intended to prevent in the National Labor Relations Act,
and administrative interpretations historically made in creating a fair system
for employee and employer decisions on workplace representations.”
A
lawsuit against the labor neutrality law is expected to be filed by various
employer groups in federal court on February 1st.
GRACE
PERIOD ENDS FOR ANNUALIZATION OF SUPPLEMENTS
(Go Top)
The
New York State Department of Labor has decided not to further extend the
willful violation “grace period” for contractors who fail to “annualize”
prevailing wage supplements beyond December 31, 2002. DOL first issued a notice in April of 1999 informing the
construction industry that prevailing wage supplements must be annualized in
order for contractors and subcontractors to be in compliance with the
prevailing wage law. At that time,
DOL’s notice provided a grace period whereby contractors found in violation of
the annualization requirements would not receive a “willful violation”. This grace period has been extended
periodically by DOL since the original notice was issued….. until now. Effective December 31, 2002, any contractor
or subcontractor found to be in violation of the annualization requirement may
be subject to a willful violation.
NESCA
MEMBERS REMINDED TO COMPLETE ECONOMIC CENSUS
(Go Top)
The
United States Department of Commerce has sent questionnaires to more than 5
million businesses (about 360,000 in New York State), launching the 2002
Economic Census. The Economic Census is
the nation’s primary source of detailed data on business and industry. The Census is taken every five years and
provides a benchmark for many other economic surveys and operations. It provides official measures of output for
industries and geographic areas.
Economic policy makers in federal, state and local governments use
Economic Census data to project trends, guide economic development and assess
the impact of economic policy. Economic
Census data also help build the foundation for Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and
other indicators of economic performance.
Businesses use Economic Census data in such ways as calculating market
share, gauging the competition, evaluating prospective locations, designing
sales territories and evaluating new business opportunities.
The
Economic Census was mailed to most businesses in every industry in December
2002. Only the smallest of businesses
within a particular industry may not receive the Census. The following groups of businesses are
included in the Census:
Ø All businesses with
employees operating in more than one place of business or establishment.
Ø All businesses with
employees operating a single place of business over a given size, which varies
by industry.
Ø A sample of businesses with
employees operating a single place of business under a given size, which varies
by industry. (Generally this includes businesses with less than 10 employees
and those businesses which as a group represent less than 10 percent of the
sales for the industry.)
Response to the Census is
required by law. Title 13, United
States Code, requires businesses that receive the questionnaire to answer the
questions and return the report to the U.S. Census Bureau. The Economic Census is also confidential and
may be used only for statistical purposes.
If someone who receives a questionnaire doesn’t return it by February
12, 2003, the Census Bureau will begin follow-up activities, which may include
sending additional copies of the questionnaire and/or phone calls from the
Census Bureau. Businesses can get help
completing the Economic Census questionnaire by visiting the Census Bureau’s Economic
Census Help web site at www.census.gov/econhelp
or by calling the Census Bureau’s toll-free help line during business hours at
1-800-233-6136.
BRUNO APPOINTS NEW JUDICIARY COMMITTEE CHAIRMAN (Go Top)
Senator
John DeFransisco of Syracuse has been appointed chairman of the Senate
Judiciary Committee by Majority Leader Joseph Bruno. This represents a positive development for subcontractors since
many ESSA bills are referred to the Judiciary Committee and Senator DeFransisco
has generally been helpful to subcontractors and the construction industry.
AIRPORT
AUTHORITY JOINS ONLINE PURCHASING GROUP
(Go Top)
The
Albany County Airport Authority has joined the Capital Region Purchasing Group (CRPG),
an online regional bid notification system created for purchasing departments
within the Capital Region. This new
e-procurement system, developed in conjunction with BidNet was created for
agencies within the Capital Region to notify businesses of bid and contract
opportunities. Businesses have access
to all CRPG participating agencies bid information from one single
website. This system provides instant
access to bids, RFP’s, addenda and awards all on one centralized system. The Airport Authority joins Albany County
and the Cities of Schenectady and Troy on this system, and additional agencies
are expected to join.
Interested
vendors who would like to receive bid opportunities from the agencies
participating in this system have two options as follows:
Option 1 – E-mail or Fax Notification
Ø Receive instant alerts for
all formal bids (over $10,000) from all participating agencies.
Ø Receive instant alerts for
all quotes (bids less than $10,000) from all participating agencies.
Ø Receive instant alerts for
all addenda from all participating agencies.
Ø Submit quotes (bids less
than $10,000) by e-mail or fax.
Ø Receive instant alerts when
awards are made for quotes you submit.
Ø Access all other award
information for formal bids from all participating agencies.
Ø Alerts are sent only when
they match your product/service codes.
Ø Register for one year for
$29.95, two years for $49.95, or three years for $59.95.
Option 2 – No Notification
Ø You must login and search
for all formal bids (over $10,000) for each agency.
Ø You must login for
amendments (addenda) for each agency.
Ø You must login and search
for all award information for each agency.
Ø You cannot access or submit
quotes (bids less than $10,000).
Ø Although there is no charge
for this option, you will not be notified when new bids and amendments are
issued and you must check this website frequently to avoid missing new
postings.
The Airport Authority hopes
the BidNet system will provide vendors with broader access to new business
opportunities while also providing more bid information, less paperwork and a
simplified bid process.
Contractors
and vendors who have internet access may review registration options online by
signing on to www.govbids.com and
clicking on the Capital Region Purchasing Group link. The Airport Authority will begin issuing bids, quotes, amendments
and awards via this new system beginning January 10, 2003. Companies without internet access should
call BidNet at 800-677-1997 and ask for their Vendor Support Department at
extension #214 to register by telephone.
COMPTROLLER SAYS CONTRACTOR CAN’T WEAR 2 HATS (Go Top)
A
recent opinion issued by the Office of the State Comptroller has found that a
firm may not be engaged both as construction manager to act on behalf of a
public owner in coordinating the work of prime contractors, and as one of the
prime contractors.
The
December 30, 2002 opinion was issued in response to an inquiry by the Town of
Schuyler concerning a proposed town building construction project. The town was considering engaging the
services of a construction manager to assist in certain pre-construction
matters and to manage the project during construction. The question raised was whether it would be
proper for the firm to also submit a bid and, if it was the lowest responsible
bidder, to be awarded a prime contract for a portion of the project.
In
issuing this opinion, the Comptroller stated that it has generally been held that
section 101 of the General Municipal Law (Wicks Law) does not authorize
political subdivisions to delegate to one of the prime contractors project
supervision and coordination responsibility.
The political subdivision may allow an agent to perform coordination and
supervision functions on behalf of the political subdivision, however, the
agent may not be one of the prime contractors.
Accordingly, the Comptroller found that it would be inconsistent with
section 101, as construed by the courts, for the same firm to be engaged both
as construction manager to act on behalf of the town, and as one of the prime
contractors.
The
Comptroller further stated that even if the project was not subject to section
101, the submission of a bid by a firm also engaged to coordinate and supervise
the construction work could raise a “reasonable apprehension” among the other
prospective bidders, thus creating the potential for an impaired bidding
process.
NEW YORKERS PREFER CUTTING GOVERNMENT TO RAISING TAXES (Go Top)
A
December poll of New York voters shows that New Yorkers by a significant margin
prefer cuts in government to higher taxes, as Albany deals with the state’s
current fiscal challenges.
More
than half of New Yorkers polled (52 percent) said the state should cut services
to balance the budget, a poll by Quinnipiac University Polling Institute
showed. In contrast, only 34 percent of
responding New Yorkers said the state should raise taxes.
The
poll had asked if respondents preferred “raising taxes to keep state services
at their current level or cutting state services to keep taxes at their current
level?” The poll did not include
questions about reducing taxes or cutting costs by making government more
efficient.
Forty
percent of New York voters said they dislike their local property tax the most,
followed by 17 percent each who list the federal income tax and the state sales
tax, 10 percent who list the Social Security tax, and 8 percent who list the
state income tax.
Governor
Pataki has said the state is facing a budget gap of about $2 billion this year,
and a budget gap of $5 billion or more is projected for the 2003-04 fiscal
year.